Better with Humans

Online Course Student Results with Nathalie Doremieux

• Episode 17

Use Left/Right to seek, Home/End to jump to start or end. Hold shift to jump forward or backward.

0:00 | 49:00
She charged ten people $500, then told them if they did the work and got the result, she'd give the money back. And she did. My guest this week is Nathalie Doremieux of The Membership Lab, who has spent twenty years in business with her husband helping people build online programmes that actually get their students results. That refund story stuck with me, because it wasn't a marketing trick. Nathalie wasn't testing whether the course would sell. She was testing whether it worked. And the answer she got back was uncomfortable. She could get all ten across the line, but only by standing behind every single one of them. Not scalable. Not what she'd hoped for. Still the right result, because it was the truth. Most of what we're sold about launches is the opposite of that. Six figures. Seven figures. Nathalie's question cuts straight through it. What happened to your students? Anyone with a big enough audience can find fifteen glowing testimonials. Nobody puts the other ninety five percent on the sales page. I've been in those rooms. Same content, same access, wildly different outcomes, and no real support for the people quietly stuck in the middle. We spent a good chunk of the conversation on AI, and Nathalie's approach is the most useful I've heard in a while. She doesn't use it to write her posts. She uses it to build tools inside programmes that help people take the action they're avoiding. A role play for the hard conversation with your boss. A guided prompt that asks you the right questions about your own profile rather than writing it for you. The AI never makes the decision. It just removes the excuse not to start. Her client Takumor has a rule for content that I'm going to keep. If someone else could have written it, it isn't you. AI can be polished. It can be consistent. It cannot have had your Tuesday. The flaws are the point. They're the bit no model can reproduce. And there's a quieter risk underneath all of it. Costs shifting, models degrading, agents making decisions you never sanctioned. We wouldn't build a business on one client or one supplier. Worth asking why so many are happily building one on a single machine. So here's the question I'm leaving with. Not how much did it make, but who actually got where they were going? Connect with Nathalie Doremieux: LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/nathaliedoremieux/ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/natdoremieux Website: https://themembershiplab.com

Send us Fan Mail

Support the show

This was made with humans.

Your host - Shaun Phillips

Follow us for episode clips https://www.instagram.com/betterwithhumans
TikTok - https://www.tiktok.com/@betterwithhumans

All episodes and news at https://www.betterwithhumans.com

Want to watch episodes instead, check out https://www.youtube.com/@betterwithhumans?sub_confirmation=1

Connect with Shaun on Linkedin - https://www.linkedin.com/in/shaunph/

Editor: Glen Boswell
https://astralforgefilm.com
https://www.instagram.com/thebozzyman

Original music composed and produced by Brokli - https://youtube.com/@iambrokli

Original logo illustration and in video podcast graphics by Jesse Rist - https://instagram.com/jesse_rist


People on this episode

Podcasts we love

Check out these other fine podcasts recommended by us, not an algorithm.

AI for Equity Artwork

AI for Equity

Jenny and Leah Garrett